There is a particular kind of Buddhist teaching that sounds beautiful until you actually try to practice it. Wishing happiness for others is easy enough when we feel generous.
But what happens when someone has hurt us? When another person's success makes us feel small? When we are exhausted, disappointed, afraid, or simply caught up in our own problems?
This is where the teachings of Śāntideva become much more challenging.
Śāntideva, an eighth-century Indian Buddhist monk and scholar associated with Nālandā, is best known for the Bodhicaryāvatāra, often translated as A Guide to the Bodhisattva's Way of Life. Traditional accounts describe him as a somewhat mysterious figure at Nālandā, nicknamed Bhusuku because he was perceived as doing little beyond eating, sleeping, and walking. When challenged to give a teaching, he is said to have recited the Bodhicaryāvatāra, eventually rising into the air while continuing to teach.
Whether every detail of that story is historical is less important to me than what the story points toward: sometimes the deepest practice is happening somewhere we cannot see.
Śāntideva's teaching on exchanging self and others is one such practice. It asks us to examine something we normally take for granted—the assumption that my suffering matters more because it is mine.
And when I sit with that idea, I find that it is much more uncomfortable than it first appears.
The Habit of Making Everything About Me
Most of us do not wake up intending to be self-centred.
Yet the mind naturally organizes experience around "me."
My plans.
My problems.
My reputation.
My relationships.
My disappointments.
My future.
Even spiritual practice can quietly become another possession of the self: my progress, my awakening, my meditation, my understanding.
I have noticed this tendency in myself particularly when something does not go the way I expected.
A small disagreement can suddenly become very important. Someone's words can stay in the mind for hours. Another person's success can trigger comparison. A minor inconvenience can feel disproportionately painful simply because it has interrupted the story I was telling myself about how things should be.
Śāntideva's approach cuts directly into this habit.
He asks us to consider why our own happiness should automatically receive greater importance than the happiness of another person.
This does not mean pretending that our own pain does not exist. It means questioning the extra importance we habitually place upon it simply because it belongs to "me."
That distinction is subtle, but it changes the practice completely.
The First Step: Equalizing Self and Others
The first movement is equalization.
Everyone wants happiness. Everyone wants relief from suffering.
The circumstances are different, personalities are different, cultures are different, and our stories are different. But beneath all of this, there is something remarkably familiar.
The person sitting across from me has fears.
So does the person I disagree with.
The person I envy has vulnerabilities.
The person who frustrates me also experiences loneliness, uncertainty, disappointment and loss.
Even someone I know nothing about is carrying an inner life that is every bit as immediate to them as mine is to me.
Śāntideva uses the image of a body to make this point. If a thorn enters the foot, the hand reaches down to remove it. The hand does not stop to decide whether the foot is sufficiently important to deserve assistance. The body responds because the pain belongs to the body.
The analogy is simple, but it stays with me.
Perhaps compassion begins when I stop treating other people's suffering as somehow less real simply because I experience my own suffering from the inside.
Then Comes the Difficult Part: Exchanging Self and Others
Equalizing self and others is already challenging.
Exchanging self and others goes further.
The practice associated with Śāntideva asks us to deliberately challenge the instinct to place ourselves at the centre of concern. Instead of automatically thinking, How can I protect myself? How can I get what I want? How can I avoid discomfort?, we begin cultivating the question:
How can I respond to the needs of others with the same seriousness I usually reserve for myself?
This is not about developing self-hatred.
It is not about becoming passive.
It is not about allowing people to mistreat us.
And it certainly does not mean that healthy boundaries disappear.
For me, the more interesting interpretation is that the practice changes where attention habitually rests. The self is no longer treated as the unquestioned centre around which everything else revolves.
That can be surprisingly liberating.
I have sometimes noticed how much energy is consumed by defending an image of myself.
Wanting to be understood.
Wanting to be appreciated.
Wanting to be right.
Wanting to be seen in a particular way.
When I look closely, much of this is not really about what is happening in the present moment. It is about protecting a story of who I think I am.
Śāntideva's practice asks us to loosen our grip on that story.
Seeing Yourself From Another Perspective
One of the powerful aspects of this teaching is the deliberate use of perspective.
Instead of looking at myself only from inside my own narrative, I can imagine seeing the situation from someone else's position.
What does my behaviour look like from their side?
What might I be unable to see because I am too invested in being right?
How might my own privileges, assumptions or insecurities appear to someone experiencing the same situation differently?
This does not mean that the other person's interpretation is automatically correct.
It means that my interpretation is not automatically complete.
That is an important distinction.
In ordinary life, the mind can become extremely convincing when it is defending itself. A disagreement quickly becomes a case against another person. A criticism becomes an attack. Someone else's success becomes evidence that I am falling behind.
Perspective interrupts that momentum.
For a moment, I am no longer trapped entirely inside my own version of events.
From Śāntideva to Tonglen
Centuries after Śāntideva, Tibetan Lojong, or mind-training, traditions developed practical methods for working with these teachings.
One of the best known is Tonglen, usually translated as "taking and sending."
The practice is often associated with breathing meditation.
On the inhalation, we imagine taking in suffering. On the exhalation, we imagine sending out relief, kindness, wellbeing or whatever is needed.
At first, this can sound almost backwards.
Most of us instinctively want to breathe in what feels pleasant and push away what feels uncomfortable. Tonglen deliberately turns that instinct around.
We do not have to believe that we are literally absorbing another person's suffering and magically transferring healing to them. I find it more useful to understand the practice as a deliberate training of the heart.
Instead of automatically turning away from suffering, we learn to remain present with it.
Instead of tightening around our own discomfort, we remember that others experience the same fundamental vulnerability.
Instead of keeping compassion as an abstract idea, we give it a physical rhythm through the breath.
The Practice in Simpler Terms
A traditional Tonglen practice can be approached quite simply.
Bring to mind one person who is suffering.
It might be someone you love. It might eventually be someone you find difficult.
As you breathe in, acknowledge their suffering. You can imagine it as darkness, heaviness, smoke or simply as the felt reality of their pain.
As you breathe out, imagine offering them whatever would genuinely help: peace, safety, courage, warmth, clarity or relief.
There is no need to force a dramatic visualization.
Sometimes I find that a very simple awareness works better.
This person is hurting.
I know something about hurting.
May they have some relief.
That can be enough.
The practice is not necessarily about producing an extraordinary meditative experience. It is about repeatedly interrupting the reflex that says, my experience first, everyone else second.
When the Person Is Difficult
This is where Tonglen becomes particularly interesting.
It is relatively easy to practice compassion for someone we already love.
The challenge comes when the person is irritating, unfair, dismissive or simply difficult for us.
I do not think the answer is to pretend that harmful behaviour is acceptable.
Compassion does not require abandoning discernment.
Someone can be wrong, and I can still wish that they become less trapped in whatever causes them to behave that way.
Someone can hurt me, and I can still recognize that they are a suffering being.
Those two things can coexist.
This has been one of the more useful shifts for me.
I do not have to manufacture affection for everyone.
I can begin with something much smaller:
This person wants to be free from suffering too.
That thought can soften something without requiring me to deny what happened.
Turning Our Own Difficulties Into Practice
There is another dimension of these teachings that I find particularly practical.
What happens when the person suffering is me?
Lojong teachings encourage us to use difficult circumstances as material for practice rather than seeing them only as obstacles to happiness.
This does not mean romanticizing suffering.
Pain is still painful.
Loss is still loss.
Grief does not become less real because we put a spiritual interpretation around it.
But our relationship with difficulty can change.
When I am going through something unpleasant, I can sometimes remember that I am not experiencing a uniquely personal category of suffering. Whatever I am feeling—fear, disappointment, loneliness, uncertainty—is being experienced by countless other people right now.
That recognition can create a strange form of companionship.
Instead of thinking:
Why is this happening to me?
there can be a quieter thought:
Other people know this feeling too.
And from there:
May my experience help me understand theirs.
The difficulty has not disappeared.
But it is no longer completely isolated inside the boundaries of "my story."
Compassion Without Self-Erasure
There is a potential misunderstanding here that is worth addressing.
Exchanging self and others does not mean that we should disregard ourselves.
Buddhist compassion is not supposed to become another form of self-punishment.
If I am exhausted, I may need rest.
If someone is harming me, I may need distance.
If I have made a mistake, I can acknowledge it without turning myself into an enemy.
Caring for myself can itself be an expression of compassion, because I too am one of the beings who wishes to be free from suffering.
The deeper challenge is not to replace selfishness with self-neglect.
It is to loosen the rigid boundary that makes "my wellbeing" fundamentally important and "your wellbeing" somehow secondary.
That feels very different.
What Begins to Change
I do not think practices like Tonglen suddenly transform a person into someone who is endlessly compassionate.
At least, that has not been my experience.
The change is usually much smaller.
I notice irritation a little earlier.
I catch myself constructing a story about someone and become curious about it.
I remember that the stranger who annoyed me is also carrying an entire life I know nothing about.
I become slightly less interested in winning an argument.
Sometimes I remember to wish someone well when my first instinct was to judge them.
These moments are easy to overlook because they are not dramatic.
But perhaps that is the point.
Compassion is not always an overwhelming spiritual feeling. Sometimes it is simply the space between an impulse and the action that follows it.
The Alchemy of Taking and Sending
The word "alchemy" in the title may sound grand, but there is something genuinely alchemical about this practice.
Tonglen takes something we normally reject—pain—and changes our relationship to it.
It takes vulnerability and turns it into connection.
It takes the instinct to protect the ego and uses it as an opportunity to notice the ego.
It takes personal suffering and allows it to become a doorway into recognizing the suffering of others.
The pain itself has not necessarily changed.
What changes is the meaning we give it and the way we hold it.
This is also why I find Śāntideva's teaching relevant far beyond formal meditation.
There are opportunities for this practice everywhere.
In traffic.
During an argument.
When someone receives praise that I wanted.
When I feel overlooked.
When I encounter someone whose behaviour I dislike.
When my own plans collapse.
Each situation can become another small invitation to loosen the boundaries of self.
A Wider Heart
Śāntideva's famous verses describe the relationship between self-centredness and suffering in uncompromising terms. His basic insight is that the pursuit of happiness exclusively for oneself does not produce the freedom we imagine it will.
The more tightly I hold onto me, the more there is to defend.
The more there is to defend, the more easily I can be threatened.
And the more threatened I feel, the smaller my world becomes.
Compassion moves in the opposite direction.
It widens the field.
This does not mean that every problem disappears. It means that the mind no longer has to carry every experience as a private possession.
Someone else's happiness does not have to diminish mine.
Someone else's pain does not have to remain completely outside my concern.
And my own suffering does not have to be wasted.
Perhaps this is what I appreciate most about the meeting point between Śāntideva and Tonglen.
The teaching is radical, but the practice can be very ordinary.
One breath.
One difficult person.
One moment of comparison.
One memory of our shared vulnerability.
One small decision not to make the self the centre of everything.
Then another.
I am beginning to see compassion less as something I need to feel perfectly and more as a direction in which I can repeatedly turn.
The heart does not have to become limitless overnight.
It simply has to become a little less defended.
And perhaps, over time, that is how the exchange begins.
A Closing Prayer
Perhaps this is where the practice ultimately leads: not to becoming perfect, but to becoming available to compassion. Śāntideva's closing aspiration expresses this beautifully. It is not a promise that I can remove the world's suffering, but a willingness to remain present and useful for as long as there are beings who suffer. For me, the prayer feels less like a grand spiritual declaration and more like a direction for living—an aspiration to let whatever understanding, kindness and presence I cultivate become of some benefit beyond myself.
ākāśasya sthitir yāvad yāvac ca jagataḥ sthitih
tāvan mama sthitir bhūyāj jagadduḥkhāni nighnataḥ
For as long as space endures and for as long as the world lasts, may I live dispelling the miseries of the world.
May this aspiration gradually become more than words. May the heart learn to remain open. May suffering become a doorway to compassion rather than separation. And for as long as there is suffering in this world, may there be a willingness within me to meet it with whatever kindness, wisdom and presence I can offer.
Take your first step into the world of Tibetan Buddhism with The Five Gateways of Awakening, a contemplative practice manual inspired by Vajrayana archetypes.